Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" |
---|---|
From: | n4kw@citrus.infi.net (Pete Raymond) |
Date: | Wed Nov 4 10:13:17 1998 |
Doug Re the 1997 CQWWSSB My question is simple, when you do not lose any claimed multiplyers, your are docked 32Q's with a max of 3 points each (96 points) yet your calimed score is reduced by over 130,000 points. Would you say that was excessive, I would. 73 Pete N4KW -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Unusual contest behavior, K4WW@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX High-Claimed scores ??!!, Pedro Pedroso |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change", DougKR2Q@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change", n6tr@teleport.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |