This would be interesting, but not entirely meaningful. If the scoring
system changes, most contesters would probably re-evaluate their strategies
and adapt to maximize their scores, and such an analysis of past logs
would not reveal those implications.
Thus spoke Milt Jensen:
>
>
> Why wait. The logs are available for past contests. Just take a set of
> them and apply the proposed scoring routine. Surely someone out there
> has the time to do this exercise and report back. Good luck es 73 de
> Milt, N5IA
>
> Scot Herrick wrote:
> >
> > Rather than talk about all of the different scoring ideas, why can't we have
> > a "simulated" contest within the contest. In short, report on the current
> > scoring structure, but have an alternative scoring fit an agreed-upon format
> > for the simulation.
> >
> > Thus, work and report the contest as traditional, then also report it with
> > "0 points in the own country, 3 points outside" and see what the effect
> > would be on the overall results. You could probably get a very good idea of
> > the differences the format makes with reporting from 200 or so stations. A
> > worthwhile - and then will come the controversy - experiment.
> >
> > CU...Scot, K9JY
> >
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin Amateur Radio Callsign: KM5FA
Department of the Computer Sciences President, UT Amateur Radio Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124 Maintainer of the Linux Laptop Home Page
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|