Question:
Why are the high scores (high power) listed last in the SS listings,
under the low power scores, which are under the QRP scores?
This results in the score listings (from top to bottom) falling from
the high QRP score to low QRP score, then jumping up to the
high low-power score down to the low low-power score, and
finally jumping to the high high-power score ( THE SECTION
WINNER in most cases) and down to the low high-power score.
This hides the section winner somewhere in the middle of each listing.
If the high power scores were listed first, followed by the low power
scores, and finally the QRP scores, a more uniform listing by score
would result. (Yes, I know there are exceptions, but the present
system is VERY confusing and difficult to follow.)
What does ARRL have against placing the winners at the TOP?
de Tom N4KG
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|