CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

ct.

Subject: ct.
From: NRJ.ERJKMO@memo.ericsson.se (NRJ.ERJKMO@memo.ericsson.se)
Date: Thu Nov 21 05:09:00 1996
--- Received from NRJ.ERJKMO  81-6-468-3270         96-11-21 12:09
  -> VAX.CQ-CONTEST..TGV.COM..INET
  -: - - - - - - - - - - > MAIL USER IN VAX AND INTERNET

Hello,

I wonder if some of you know how to change QSLMODE from QSL TNX
to QSL PLEASE in CT ver.9.

Thanks in advance.

Moe/JN3WYD


>From WB2JSJ@vbi.champlain.edu (Mitchell Stern)  Thu Nov 21 00:04:42 1996
From: WB2JSJ@vbi.champlain.edu (Mitchell Stern) (Mitchell Stern)
Subject: More SS Incidents
Message-ID: <9611210002.4293e247.CCC@vbi.champlain.edu>

Besides the SSTV characters and the nuts on 75m, I ran into a
humerous character on 20 meters.

I was sitting on 14.1503  (yes, this IS in the band on USB) to
get some temporary relief from the horrible QRM which was
everywhere else. 

This chap rolls up on frequency and informs me that I'm in the
Canadian Window.  I never knew there was such a thing as a
Canadian Window.  Perhaps there is such a company up there which
makes highly insulated glass - I don't know...

I informed him that I was not in his Canadian Window, and was
operating legally.

He continued to complain (and maliciously interfere).   I asked
him for his callsign.  Much to my surprise he gave it - a TG9!!
I'm not sure why a TG9 is so concerned about the Canadian Window.
Anyway, I asked him if he worked for the FCC or DOC, to which he
replied no.  I then told him that whatever frequency I choose to
be on is my responsibility and he shouldn't be concerned about
which "Window" I happen to be in.  

Satisfied with this answer, he left! (probably the biggest
surprise - and relief!)


With total lack of enforcement by the FCC, our bands have become
virtually lawless.  You can do most anything you want and get
away with it, as long as it isn't sustained for a long period of
time.  Ignoring it is fine, but some of these guys occasionally
have big signals and know how to use them (fortunately, a
minority).  Maybe we, as hams need to employ satellite technology
to determine the whereabouts of these folks and let them know
that we know who they are.  Faced with exposure, most will take
up other pursuits.  The FCC gets time on the government sats for
ocassional DFing jobs.  Perhaps this might be a nice side feature
of the next bunch of OSCARS.  

We can dream, can't we.

And get your #$%@* contest off of MY frequency!

73, Mitch WB1GQR

>From AD1C@tiac.net (Jim Reisert AD1C)  Thu Nov 21 03:57:58 1996
From: AD1C@tiac.net (Jim Reisert AD1C) (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Subject: Backup^2 site for CT files (CTY and MASTER)
Message-ID: <199611210458.XAA32014@mailnfs0.tiac.net>

I have uploaded some files to my personal web site:

        http://www.tiac.net/users/ad1c/master.zip
        http://www.tiac.net/users/ad1c/masterdx.zip
        http://www.tiac.net/users/ad1c/masusve.zip
        http://www.tiac.net/users/ad1c/cty-605.zip

Sorry, you'll only be able to get these with a web browser, no E-mail or
FTP.

I hope the router at my office will be fixed tomorrow so the files at:

        ftp://boss.databook.com/AD1C/

might be available once again.

73 - Jim AD1C

--
Jim Reisert <AD1C@tiac.net>                    http://www.tiac.net/users/ad1c/



>From ddjones@nas.com (Dale Jones K5MM)  Thu Nov 21 06:06:35 1996
From: ddjones@nas.com (Dale Jones K5MM) (Dale Jones K5MM)
Subject: Humorous SS incidents-from WB2JSJ
Message-ID: <m0vQSHT-000DFPC@cleese.nas.com>

    Mitch, WB2JSJ wrote about the humorous character on 20 meters
    in the ss-phone contest.  Here are a couple of thoughts on
    getting rid of such people:


        Mitch
        In years that have passed by, while operating in both the 
        US and in Europe, I found it most effective to acknowledge 
        those "jerk Policemen" kindly.  Some possible responses to
        guys who want to tell you that you are outside of your
        assigned band (in the Canadian band), when in fact you
        are NOT outside:

        1.      Ooopps, sorry about that & thanks for the info, 
        I'll check that out here momentarily.....QRZ SS

        2.      Thanks for the info, but I have special authoriza-
        tion from the FCC to operate here.  Appreciate the input 
        though. (Note:  Your special authorization is your Ham 
        License)

        3.      Thanks for the info....I'll check the freq and 
        QSY momentarily....by the way you are 59-North
        Dakota....or whatever.

        This technique and others like it usually satisfy those 
        guys, they don't continue to hassle you, and usually they 
        go away.  It is just tough to do.....because everyone 
        wants to OJ them!!

        It really does work!!

        73
        Dale  K5MM



At 12:04 AM 11/21/96 -5-1, you wrote:
>Besides the SSTV characters and the nuts on 75m, I ran into a
>humerous character on 20 meters.
>
>I was sitting on 14.1503  (yes, this IS in the band on USB) to
>get some temporary relief from the horrible QRM which was
>everywhere else. 
>
>This chap rolls up on frequency and informs me that I'm in the
>Canadian Window.  I never knew there was such a thing as a
>Canadian Window.  Perhaps there is such a company up there which
>makes highly insulated glass - I don't know...
>
>I informed him that I was not in his Canadian Window, and was
>operating legally.
>
>He continued to complain (and maliciously interfere).   I asked
>him for his callsign.  Much to my surprise he gave it - a TG9!!
>I'm not sure why a TG9 is so concerned about the Canadian Window.
>Anyway, I asked him if he worked for the FCC or DOC, to which he
>replied no.  I then told him that whatever frequency I choose to
>be on is my responsibility and he shouldn't be concerned about
>which "Window" I happen to be in.  
>
>Satisfied with this answer, he left! (probably the biggest
>surprise - and relief!)
>
>
>With total lack of enforcement by the FCC, our bands have become
>virtually lawless.  You can do most anything you want and get
>away with it, as long as it isn't sustained for a long period of
>time.  Ignoring it is fine, but some of these guys occasionally
>have big signals and know how to use them (fortunately, a
>minority).  Maybe we, as hams need to employ satellite technology
>to determine the whereabouts of these folks and let them know
>that we know who they are.  Faced with exposure, most will take
>up other pursuits.  The FCC gets time on the government sats for
>ocassional DFing jobs.  Perhaps this might be a nice side feature
>of the next bunch of OSCARS.  
>
>We can dream, can't we.
>
>And get your #$%@* contest off of MY frequency!
>
>73, Mitch WB1GQR
>
>

>From kk7a@micron.net (Jim - KK7A)  Thu Nov 21 06:36:59 1996
From: kk7a@micron.net (Jim - KK7A) (Jim - KK7A)
Subject: Force12 e-mail address?
Message-ID: <01BBD73B.BB8330C0@cboi073p09.boi.micron.net>

        I have tried several times to send an e-mail to the Force12 company =
with no success.  The e-mail address I am using is force12@ibm.net which =
bounces because "ibm.net" does not know of that local user.  This was =
the address in their ads.  Any clue what the real address is?

        Thanks, Jim - KK7A

---------------------------------------------
Jim Larson - KK7A - <><
Boise, Idaho
http://netnow.micron.net/~kk7a/
---------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • ct., NRJ.ERJKMO@memo.ericsson.se <=