Step 1 - complete - Picked 25 callsigns/filled out and mailed 610V.
Step 2 - complete - According to the USPS my 610V is at the post office in
Pittsburgh, that leaves:
WAITING!
? - the ham formerly known as K1ZX
>From jesposit@sctcorp.com (Joe Esposito) Sat Sep 21 17:30:00 1996
From: jesposit@sctcorp.com (Joe Esposito) (Joe Esposito)
Subject: Ibero-Americana Contest Dates
Message-ID: <m0v4UwZ-0003cCC@sctladm.sctcorp.com>
The October issue of CQ Magazine incorrectly lists the dates of the
Ibero-Americana contest as October 7-8. It should October 5-6.
73,
Joe, K2YJL
>From aa8u@voyager.net (AA8U) Sat Sep 21 20:15:55 1996
From: aa8u@voyager.net (AA8U) (AA8U)
Subject: VOACAP Software
Message-ID: <199609211915.PAA01297@vixa.voyager.net>
Hello All,
A while back there was a notice posted that told of the web site where the
VOACAP (I think that is what it was) propagation software could be
downloaded. I have lost the info and the VOACAP software I downloaded at
that time due to hard drive failure. Please advise where this site is so I
can try again.
Thanks in advance,
Bruce
AA8U
aa8u@voyager.net
>From jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid) Sat Sep 21 20:33:24 1996
From: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid) (Jim Reid)
Subject: Stessed? Gate 2 - Step 2 complete
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19960921193324.0067838c@aloha.net>
At 10:34 AM 9/21/96 -0400, you wrote:
>Step 1 - complete - Picked 25 callsigns/filled out and mailed 610V.
Me to, Express Mail, $10.75 to USPS!
All my selected calls were prefixed KH7, KH6, or AH7, but all
of the firest five picks were KH7x1's. I decided to go against some
advice from great guys that a 2x2 call would be better for contesting,
just couldn'g overcome the "want" for a 2x1. Anyway will be pleased
to have the AH prefix behind me ( freud type pun?).
>Step 2 - complete - According to the USPS my 610V is at the post office in
>Pittsburgh,
Well, as mine didn't leave Kauai until late in the afternoon Friday for the
big postal system sorting act in Honolulu, assume mine might be
on a USPS carrier winging on to Pittsburgh today.
I did look and look, and I could find no instruction specifying that
the $30 check be attached to the 610V, so it is loose in the envelop,
hope this is not a rejection triggering goof on my part, but I did look!
Only item attached to the form is the copy of my license. If I goofed,
will send in another app post haste!!
> that leaves:
>
>WAITING!
Yes, and the ARRL says that may mean three weeks or so until all
is entered into the BIG COMPUTER in Gettysbugh where and when
the big random number generator will begin spitting out the selection
code as to which/whose application will be the first!
73 , so QRX and now we QSX!
Jim, for now, AH6NB
>From n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt) Sat Sep 21 20:45:12 1996
From: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt) (Jim Pratt)
Subject: ARRL club rules
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9609211236.A15873-0100000@netcom18>
Sorry to interrupt the Vanity Call discussion to bring up a CONTEST
matter, but here goes anyway...
For a great many years, I have been a member of the River City
Contesters. This is a "Local Club" per the rules of the ARRL, and this
club has been very successful in winning local club gavels in ARRL contests.
After the WRTC, I decided to rejoin the Norther California Contest Club,
to provide them my support. I was a member LONG ago, and left for
various reasons. One of the reasons I left was the inevitable mental
wrangling that I had to go through to decide which club got my score in
an ARRL contest. When I was only a member of the RCC, it was no
question. Now that I have "dual citizenship" again, the calls (and
problems) are already beginning...
NCCC wants my score for CW Sweepstakes. Now, this isn't REALLY a problem
for me since I will be operating at W6GO, and he is not a member of the
NCCC. So, I can only give this score to the RCC. BUT, certain NCCC
folks are already gently twisting my arm to try and get W6GO to rejoin
the NCCC so my big CW SS score can go for the NCCC.
I read with dismay that the Contest Advisory Committee dropped a proposal
that would have allowed for submitting a score for both a "local club" as
well as an "unlimited club". The rationale I have heard is that this
rule would have encouraged the formation of "paper" local clubs, thus
"harming" the contest awards program.
I do not understand this. In order to submit a club score for an ARRL
contest, you have to first have an ARRL AFFILIATED CLUB to submit it
for. Becoming an affiliated club is not a trivial matter, having been
down that road. It involves submitting by-laws, constitution, etc.,
along with many forms, for ARRL review. As I recall, it also involves a
vote of the ARRL Board of Directors. If anyone wants to form a"paper
club" that much, I say LET THEM!!
I knew nothing about this CAC discussion until AFTER they dismissed the
action. I suspect my lack of knowledge was strictly my fault, but many
others did not know as well. I encourage the CAC to reconsider this
decision post haste, and allow for "dual club" submission. I believe
that a "local" and a "medium", OR a "local" and an "unlimited" should be
allowed. Don't allow submission to all three, and don't allow a "medium"
and an "unlimited".
The "harm" that CAC members suspected would occur if they adopted this is
less that the "harm" that happens every contest when two clubs start
twisting a member's arm to submit a score for them. In the past, I have
decided to NOT OPERATE rather than make a decision and hurt someone's
feelings. I don't think I would do that today, but others would. So, by
not allowing this "dual entry", I suspect that activity is being hindered.
I have made my feelings known to N6TV, my CAC representative. Let your
opinions be known as well. Now back to our regularly scheduled
programming...
73, Jim N6IG
n6ig@netcom.com
>From jon@vii.com (Jon) Wed Sep 4 02:52:17 1996
From: jon@vii.com (Jon) (Jon)
Subject: Vanity Calls submitted
Message-ID: <199609211951.NAA09653@lonepeak.vii.com>
Anyone willing now to post to the forum the list of calls they submitted.
It will be interesting to see what people want.
Also if what you want is on my list. I was going to apply via the web but
went the $10.75 route with the USPS.
Jon
kg7te
>From w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner) Sat Sep 21 21:36:35 1996
From: w2up@voicenet.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner)
Subject: Call updates?
Message-ID: <199609212036.QAA28478@mail.voicenet.com>
Is anyone going to have a database and/or Web sight with all the call
changes? (I still haven't caught up with everyone from the 1975
changes, hi)
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@voicenet.com
Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com
>From thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson) Sat Sep 21 20:50:28 1996
From: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson) (David L. Thompson)
Subject: Don't list your vanity calls
Message-ID: <199609212038.QAA24821@answerman.mindspring.com>
Please don't list the vanity calls here..we can see them at the KI4HN web page!
Dave K4JRB
>From floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) Sat Sep 21 21:27:42 1996
From: floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) (Jimmy R. Floyd)
Subject: NA SPRINT CW 96 Scores FINAL POSTING
Message-ID: <2.2.16.19960921202742.259fd758@interpath.com>
NA SPRINT CW 96
Raw Scores
Compiled by
>> WA4ZXA <<
floydjr@interpath.com
Date Posted: 09/21/96
****** FINAL POSTING *******
CALL SCORE QSO'S MULTIS
________________________________________________________________________
High Power
K4VX (WX3N) 15,318 333 46
N6TR 15,318 333 46
K5GN 14,895 331 45
N5RZ 14,432 328 44
W2RQ 14,260 310 46
K5GA 14,168 308 46
N2NT 13,995 311 45
K1KI 13,995 311 45
N6AA 13,959 297 47
N6TV 13,938 303 46
KM9P 13,588 316 41
N6IG 13,410 298 45
K5ZD 13,332 303 44
KN5H 12,375 275 45
N4ZZ 12,330 274 45
W1WEF 12,169 283 43
WB0O 12,012 273 44
N6XI 11,925 265 45
K8MR 11,836 269 44
N6ZZ 11,700 260 43
KZ2S (@N2NU) 11,685 285 41
AA3B 11,572 263 44
KW8N 11,524 268 43
K0RF 11,480 280 41
AB6FO 11,475 255 45
N3BB 11,424 272 42
N5FG (WQ5L) 11,193 273 41
N6VR 11,094 258
AD5Q 11,070 270 41
KM0L 10,209 249 41
KE3Q 10,200 255 40
W6RGG 10,120 230 44
N4BP 10,080 224 45
KE3Q 10,250 255 40
NA5Q 10,250 250 41
K7SS/Remote 9,976 232 43
KF6A 9,812 223 44
KU8E 9,804 228 43
KJ6HO (K6OY) 9,618 229 42
K0AD 9,520 238 40
K8HVT 9,520 238 40
KC4ZV 9,492 226 42
K3MD 9,460 221 41
AA7BG 9,389 229 41
W6EMS 9,240 231 39
WB5B 9,196 242 38
N5DU 9,030 210 43
K0DEQ 8,240 206 40
KB4GID 8,066 218 37
K9WIE 8,000 200 40
K8JM 7,980 190 42
WB9HRO 7,600 190 40
N4ZR 7,600 190 40
WR3O 6,156 164 37
K9VV 6,142 166 37
AE0M 5,698 154 37
K8KFJ 3,120 80 39
K6XO 2,781 103 27
Low Power
NM5M 12,700 282 45
KC6CNV 10,492 244 43
N0AX 9,331 217 43
WA2SRQ 9,243 237 39
K09Y 8,862 211 42
AA8AV 8,610 210 41
KK9W 8,580 220 37
N9JF 8,346 214 39
KG5U 8,280 207 40
K0DEQ 8,240 206 40
AD4VH 8,190 210 39
K8JLF 8,160 204 40
AA0BY 7,696 208 37
KY2P 7,840 196 40
AA4GA 7,462 182 40
W7ZRC 7,437 201 37
KB0IHM 7,332 188 39
N6CW/QRP 7,280 182 40
AB5LX 5,256 146 36
WA0I 4,998 147 34
N0DH 4,935 141 35
N4OGW/5 4,865 139 35
WD4AHZ 4,800 150 32
AA9JY 4,212 117 36
K7NPN 4,158 126 33
W9WI 4,070 110 37
K3CR (KB3AFT) 3,875 125 31
N2LSK 3,596 124 29
ND8L 3,570 105 34
WA7UVJ 3,232 101 32
KK7A 2,834 109 26
WB0OLA 2,160 72 30
KA8OKH 1,960 70 28
K0EJ 1,600 50 32
WA0RJY 1,298 59 22
AA4LR 90 10 9
Team Scores
Rockcrushers 63,528
Annihilators 42,910
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
REMEMBER THESE SCORES ARE UNOFFICIAL AND THIS IS NOT WHERE YOU SEND ANY
LOGS!! ^^^
If you did not state what power you were running I put you in High Power.
If that is wrong just emial me and I will change it.
73's Jim
**********************************************************
* Jimmy R. Floyd (Jim) Thomasville, NC *
* *
* Amateur Call: >> WA4ZXA << *
* Packet Node: >> N4ZC << *
* Internet Address: >> floydjr@interpath.com << *
**********************************************************
>From floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) Sat Sep 21 21:27:47 1996
From: floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) (Jimmy R. Floyd)
Subject: NA SPRINT SSB 96 Scores II
Message-ID: <2.2.16.19960921202747.259ffce4@interpath.com>
NA SPRINT SSB 96
Raw Scores
Compiled by
>> WA4ZXA <<
floydjr@interpath.com
Date Posted: 09/21/96
CALL SCORE QSO'S MULTIS
________________________________________________________________________
High Power
N6TR 15,953 301 46
K4VX (AG9A) 14,040 270 52
AA5RB (@N3BB) 13,916 284 49
WB0O 13,475 275 49
KW8N 13,400 268 50
K5GA 13,350 267 50
N6RO 12,240 240 51
KB5YVT 10,105 215 47
N6HC 10,105 215 47
AA4NC (KI4HN) 9,200 200 46
KJ6HO 8,904 212 42
W5ASP 8,878 193 46
KM0L 8,464 184 46
KC6CNV 8,404 191 44
KE3Q 6,450 150 43
W9NQ 5,658 138 41
KF9YT (N9VVV) 5,577 143 39
AE0M 5,412 123 43
WN3K 3,468 102 34
AB6FO 2,790 90 31
KQ4HC 2,070 69 30
Low Power
K8JLF 5,396 142 38
KN4RI 5,371 131 41
WA0I 5,226 134 39
WK6V 5,166 126 41
N1PBT 4,551 123 37
K3CR (KB3AFT) 4,218 114 37
KF9YH 4,176 116 36
K9WIE 3,552 96 37
ND8L 3,306 87 38
KC4QFR 3,196 94 34
AA4LR 1,624 58 28
KY2P 1,032 43 24
8P6CV 98 14 7
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
REMEMBER THESE SCORES ARE UNOFFICIAL AND THIS IS NOT WHERE YOU SEND ANY
LOGS!! ^^^
If you did not state what power you were running I put you in High Power.
If that is wrong just emial me and I will change it.
73's Jim
**********************************************************
* Jimmy R. Floyd (Jim) Thomasville, NC *
* *
* Amateur Call: >> WA4ZXA << *
* Packet Node: >> N4ZC << *
* Internet Address: >> floydjr@interpath.com << *
**********************************************************
>From slazar19@sgi.net (Spike Lazar) Sat Sep 21 22:37:56 1996
From: slazar19@sgi.net (Spike Lazar) (Spike Lazar)
Subject: It pays to live in the Burgh
Message-ID: <199609212137.RAA05489@orion.bv.sgi.net>
Dear Stosh,
One of the really good things about living in the Burgh during the fall is
the Steelers and Mellon Bank. Many of the loco's will be standin in dem
lines with bales of apps., makin easy money, just waitin for dem gates to
open wide. As olde Barnum says, there is one born after every Q!
I guess its better to lucky than good! Just stopped by the Mellon Bank NA,
lucky for me dat family has made it a career workin dere, dropped off about
500 apps, which will be first in line, thank goodness blood is thicker than
water.
Also stopped by my travel agent on de way home, it's amazin how much some
peoples will pay to change der good name. If a man aint gota good name he aint
a good man. How come so many good men with good names loosin so much sweat for
a new name?
You'ins enjoy your new names, but when all your old friends pass you bye
becuz they don't know you no mo, you can always say, don't you know me?
I used to be %#@$^* !
Sincerely
dr. Bafoofnik,
p.s. Also family can recognize klub calls, dem go to de back of the line,
and two klub calls, go way way back, so far back that sun doesn't
shine dere no mo!
>From jfunk@adams.net (jim funk) Sat Sep 21 22:49:31 1996
From: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk) (jim funk)
Subject: pse/tu
Message-ID: <9609212149.AA11870@golden.adams.net>
Jon wrote: "Anyone willing now to post to the forum the list of calls they
submitted...."
Please guys, post something about a contest, *any* contest, instead. Tnx.
73, Jim N9JF
The Lane, The Pole, The 2-Yard Line, 14.002; Radio Contesting isn't for Sissies.
>From cookc@teleport.com (Craig Cook N7ENU) Sat Sep 21 23:17:18 1996
From: cookc@teleport.com (Craig Cook N7ENU) (Craig Cook N7ENU)
Subject: Mail tracking
Message-ID: <199609212217.PAA03783@desiree.teleport.com>
If you sent in your vanity list via USPS express mail, enter the number on
your receipt into the following page:
www.usps.gov/cttgate/.
You should get the info you have been sleepless over.
Craig- N7ENU
>From w0osk@juno.com (Ronald D. Klein) Sat Sep 21 23:38:25 1996
From: w0osk@juno.com (Ronald D. Klein) (Ronald D. Klein)
Subject: Stessed? Gate 2 - Step 2 complete
References: <1.5.4.32.19960921193324.0067838c@aloha.net>
Message-ID: <19960921.163817.23695.2.w0osk@juno.com>
I may hold the record for the smallest number of calls requested. I went
for K0RK - if that doesn't hit, W0OSK which I have held for 24 years,
will be back in operation and my letter to request the FCC to refund my
$30 will be in the mail.
73,
Ron Klein - W0OSK
-------------------------
w0osk@juno.com
On Sat, 21 Sep 1996 09:33:24 -1000 jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid) writes:
>At 10:34 AM 9/21/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>Step 1 - complete - Picked 25 callsigns/filled out and mailed 610V.
>
>Me to, Express Mail, $10.75 to USPS!
>
>All my selected calls were prefixed KH7, KH6, or AH7, but all
>of the firest five picks were KH7x1's. I decided to go against some
>advice from great guys that a 2x2 call would be better for contesting,
>just couldn'g overcome the "want" for a 2x1. Anyway will be pleased
>to have the AH prefix behind me ( freud type pun?).
>
>>Step 2 - complete - According to the USPS my 610V is at the post
>office in
>>Pittsburgh,
>
>Well, as mine didn't leave Kauai until late in the afternoon Friday
>for the
>big postal system sorting act in Honolulu, assume mine might be
>on a USPS carrier winging on to Pittsburgh today.
>
>I did look and look, and I could find no instruction specifying that
>the $30 check be attached to the 610V, so it is loose in the envelop,
>hope this is not a rejection triggering goof on my part, but I did
>look!
>Only item attached to the form is the copy of my license. If I
>goofed,
>will send in another app post haste!!
>
>> that leaves:
>>
>>WAITING!
>
>Yes, and the ARRL says that may mean three weeks or so until all
>is entered into the BIG COMPUTER in Gettysbugh where and when
>the big random number generator will begin spitting out the selection
>code as to which/whose application will be the first!
>
>73 , so QRX and now we QSX!
>Jim, for now, AH6NB
>
>
>From millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller) Sat Sep 21 23:55:25 1996
From: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller) (Steve Miller)
Subject: Vanity contest (was: pse/tu)
Message-ID: <m0v4axJ-00028uC@dmapub.dma.org>
N9JF wrote:
> Please guys, post something about a contest, *any* contest, instead. Tnx.
What a great idea!
Anyone interested in a vanity contest to break in everyone's new calls?
After the FCC processes the initial influx of gate 2 applications, we can
hold a short contest to use our long awaited calls and start putting the new
monikers in our "supercheck partial" databases.
Ideas? comments?
email me and I will summarize and post suggestions.
73,
Steve
?8??
|