CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

OmniVI vs FT1000MP

Subject: OmniVI vs FT1000MP
From: steve.m.zettel@internet.nps.usace.army.mil (steve.m.zettel@internet.nps.usace.army.mil)
Date: Fri Aug 9 17:27:56 1996
     As a counterpoint, I now own the same Omni VI that gave Bill troubles 
     with the microprocessor. I haven't used it in multi-radio or 
     legal-limit amplifier contest situations, or in contest situations at 
     the world-class level of operator performance that Bill routinely 
     functions at, BUT I have used it with the TenTec Hercules II amp and 
     Model 253 Autotuner with a computer interfaced fulltime for 
     autoband-switching from the Omni or the computer and have experienced 
     zero "rig-CPU" glitches. I've been very happy with it, but I'll be the 
     first to admit that my RF environment may be very different than 
     Bill's. Ditto the number of hours/operator intensity. Bill was very 
     up-front with his reasons for disatisfaction with the Omni VI before 
     we struck a deal. I haven't operated the 1000MP for any appreciable 
     time so I have no opinion about that radio.
     
     Your mileage may vary.
     
     Steve Zettel  KJ7CH                        kj7ch@libby.org
     Libby, MT                          steve.m.zettel@nps.usace.army.mil


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: OmniVI vs FT1000MP
Author:  km9p@contesting.com (Bill Fisher KM9P) at Internet


     
     
On Fri, 9 Aug 1996, John Merrill wrote:
     
> Trying to decide on one or the other. Any words of wisdom out there?
     
Yep.  I've owned both.  Buy the FT1000MP.  The Omni-6 is a great radio 
for chewing the rag on CW.  I would still own one if that is all I did.  
But as a contester, the radio falls short of my expectations.  All of the 
problems I encountered revolved around a buggy microprocessor. 
     
73
     
Bill, KM9P
     

Received: from Cone-Of-Silence.Cisco.COM by internet.nps.usace.army.mil 
(SMTPLINK V2.10.05)
    ; Fri, 09 Aug 96 13:00:29 PST
Return-Path: <owner-cq-contest@tgv.com>
X-ListName: Amateur Radio Contester's discussion list <CQ-Contest@tgv.com>
Warnings-To: <>
Errors-To: owner-cq-contest@tgv.com
Sender: owner-cq-contest@tgv.com
From: km9p@contesting.com (Bill Fisher KM9P)
Reply-To: km9p@contesting.com (Bill Fisher KM9P)
X-Sender: km9p@paris.akorn.net
To: n1jm@dreamscape.com (John Merrill)
CC: cq-contest@TGV.COM
Subject: Re: OmniVI vs FT1000MP
In-Reply-To: <320B8311.59D@dreamscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960809152914.27546A-100000@paris.akorn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • OmniVI vs FT1000MP, steve.m.zettel@internet.nps.usace.army.mil <=