>>>Hi All, I just talked to Ray WF1B, he said he would have mega problems
putting
>>>160m in his S/W for NAQP RTTY test.. He will explain this this evening
when he
>>>gets home.. You may want to hole your vote until you read Ray's comments..
>>>
>>>
>>Hi Ron,
>>I don't know if you partecipate to cq160 cw.....but I can surely assure you
>>that there weren't few hundreds of herzs to CQ's.
>>Try to image what could happen with a wider rtty signal...hi
>>Another point: in Italy only 30 khz are allowed on 160, so how many stations
>>can fit this very narrow portion of band?
>>So my vote is: IK0HBN 160 (NO)....not only for NAQP, but for all the
contests
>>
>>Cu soon on weekend...Ciao Sante
>>ik0hbn@isa.it
>
>
>If the RTTY NAQP generates 1/4 the traffic of the CQ160 contest we should
>all say "praise the lord!"
>
>For our information, which 30 khz are you allowed? 20 to 50?
>
>
>73, Tyler KF3P
>
>
DEAR TYLER,
I apologize....not 30, but only 20 khz are allowed here in Italy....for
mistake I press key "3" instead of "2"....hi...so you can find italian
stations from 1830 to 1850, but for IT9 (Sicily) only from 1830 to 1845...sigh
Now can you understand why do you copy italian stations CQ's on DX Window?
From 1840 to 1850 phone, so Cw is from 1830...(hi) to 1840....this situation
penalizes much our scores on 160 meters contest's although you can hear I
stations answering, or worse CQ's below 1830, but they make so with high
risk to see their licences withdrawn by our FCC....
Shame on me..for error.
73 de Sante
ik0hbn@isa.it
|