Subject: | Results in QST |
---|---|
From: | N1MM@aol.com (N1MM@aol.com) |
Date: | Tue May 23 18:22:18 1995 |
> > I heard a likely newly-ex-CBer on a local repeater recently scoffing at the > "RIT" term he saw on a transceiver. He said, "They can call it an `RIT' > if they want, but it's STILL a `clarifier!'" Hey, Yaesu (FT-1000), why > don't you change the "clar" label on the front of the radio to "RIT?" > > 73 > > Rich Boyd KE3Q > >>If RIT is really a clarifier, what's the correct name for XIT? :) >>Tor >>n4ogw@uiuc.edu It must be an "obfuscator"! Tom, N1MM@AOL.COM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | DX Reflector, reisert@eng.pko.dec.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | WPX Weekend, WJ2O@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | FD and WARC, paul@paccomm.com |
Next by Thread: | WPX Weekend, WJ2O@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |