| To: | <antennaware@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Antennaware] Receiving Loop |
| From: | "Andy Ingraham" <ingraham.ma.ultranet@rcn.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:05:17 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:antennaware@contesting.com> |
> ... and why most designs use RG-59 coax. I would guess this is because it has less capacitance per foot than 50 ohm coax, which raises the self-resonant frequency, and allows a wider tuning range for tuned loops. Andy _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list Antennaware@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Antennaware] Receiving Loop, K9AY |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Antennaware] Receiving Loop, Martin Kratoska |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Antennaware] Receiving Loop, K9AY |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Antennaware] Receiving Loop, Martin Kratoska |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |