To: | Amps group <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Checking Filament Voltage |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:08:37 +0000 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:29:06 -0500, Ron wrote: > I believe in this situation a huge rheostat would be better than a >variable transformer of any kind. The rheostat would greatly reduce >the "in-rush surge current." This will be much kinder to the filament >of the tube/s. REPLY: IMO, if inrush current is a concern, one should install a step-start circuit rather than depend on a rheostat which might or might not be sufficient. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL, Paul Christensen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] SS amps watercooling - was PowerGenius XL, Manfred Mornhinweg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Checking Filament Voltage, Ron Youvan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Checking Filament Voltage, MU 4CX250B |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |