Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Power thread

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Power thread
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:08:41 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:44:12 -0800
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Power thread

On Sat,2/11/2017 2:55 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
> I did the math and guess what?  1500 watts is louder than 1000 watts.

Not by a lot though -- it mostly matters when you're on the edge of the 
other guy's noise.

73, Jim K9YC

##  1.76 db is nothing to sneeze at.  Look how much bigger any ant has to be to
get another 1.76db of gain.   The bigger amp will work on all 9  HF bands. 
Albeit the bigger amp only works on TX. Your 20m yagi only works on 20m.
How are you going to manage another 1.76db on 160m band. 
You can juggle the numbers about any way you want.   If your coax loss was say 
2.76 db.... and you could reduce it by 1.76 db.... down to just 1 db,   most 
would
jump on that concept.  Perhaps increase the height of an ant that is not too 
high
to begin with, say another 1.76 db.   Lengthen the boom a bit, perhaps another
1 db.   All these dbs  start to add up.   Individually at 1st glance, each 
looks like
a wasted effort.  667 watts is only 1.76 db down from 1 kw, so why not run 667w.
The folks running 445 watts  will think its a waste of effort going to 667 
watts, since they
only achieve ...  1.76 db.   Minimize all the losses, and maximize everything 
else.  Thats
as good as it gets. 

Jim   VE7RF 


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>