| To: | Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:46:33 -0600 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
One or two others asked that early in this thread, Cathy. The answer is no, and you can go back and read the long explanation. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Nov 19, 2016 3:15 PM, "Catherine James" <catherine.james@att.net> wrote: > > Anyone care to argue that if Ben Franklin had guessed the other way about > which substance had the negative charge ... we wouldn't > be having this discussion? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow, Catherine James |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |