I've used a lot of high power SCRs in industry and built controllers
using them.
As Roy said, they will likely prove to be very difficult because of the
tremendous hash they create.
An SCR is turned on somewhere during one half of the AC cycle. A second
SCR handles the other half. The turn on leads to a very fast rise time
into an inductive load (the transformer). This creates a ringing through
a range of frequencies, much like a lightening strike.
There are ways of taming this, but In plain language, I think you will
find this approach a royal PITA
I again agree with Roy, that another transformer used in a bucking
configuration would be the most economical and probably easier than
replacing that transformer.
73
Roger (K8RI)
On 8/12/2016 Friday 1:07 PM, Jim Durham wrote:
Hello all,
This is my first posting, so Howdy..
I have a Henry 2k-2 (modified to take 3-500Zs). After I bought it,
some years back, I fired it up and tube filaments were very bright and
HV was high.
Talked to Henry. They asked me the plate transformer number, which
they looked up and said "Oh, that's the 200v European transformer".
So, I put a hefty variac on the 240v AC incoming and all is fine,
except I'd like to ditch the variac and was wondering about if anyone
on here had any wise words about using an SCR instead to back the AC
voltage off.
My experience with big SCRs (TV studio lighting) was that they tend
to put out a lot of RF hash. I also wonder about how the choke and
filter cap in the power supply would like non-sinusoidal AC waveform?
Anyone have any experience with this?
Thanks and 73,
Jim, W2XO
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|