Hi All, I also use a Bird 43 as a gold standard. Why? Because I have it
already. A 5% error amounts to about .2 dB which is close enough for my
amateur needs.
The capability of easily changing connectors is a plus not available on
most if not all of the other meters.
Maybe we should call the 43 a "Brown Standard"?
73,
Gerald K5GW
In a message dated 5/1/2015 9:58:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
drkirkby@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk writes:
On 20 April 2015 at 19:01, Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com> wrote:
> I have a number of wattmeters, but have always used the Bird or
Dielectric as the gold standard. One model allows you to switch power levels.
>
> For one station, I purchased a used Bird Hammate and added a PEP adapter
to it.
>
> 73, Colin K7FM
Why would anyone use a Bird as a gold standard? The specification on
them is an uncertainty of 5% of FSD, but in practice they are rarely
that good - even new elements.
I bought an element new from Aspen Electronics who are a Bird
distributor. I took it into where I worked (a national calibration
lab), and it was out of spec the day I got it. I took it back, said I
was only interested in performance at 432 MHz, and they adjusted it.
Then it was ok.
If all you want to do is get an approximate idea of power, then a Bird
is good. But it is never a gold standard. I'm measured 100's of
elements, and know they they rarely meet 5% of FSD when new. You can't
even guarantee 10% of FSD, although most will meet that.
Dave, G8WRB
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|