Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Electron HOLE flow

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Electron HOLE flow
From: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:25:40 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
  That is why holes can't be used to describe vacuum devices, because a hole is 
just that,
it is the "hole" left in an atom where there was once an electron.
 Just catching up on this thread and working my way back.
73
Bill wa4lav

________________________________________
From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Bill Turner 
[dezrat1242@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:18 AM
To: Amps
Subject: Re: [Amps] Electron HOLE flow

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:54:29 -0400, K8RI wrote:

>They still refer to "hole flow" in introductory semiconductors.

REPLY:

"Hole flow" is an illusion, much like the moving lights on a theater
marquee. If it helps to understand things fine, but holes don't move. It's
more accurate to say a hole is created in one atom and disappears in
another. For a brief time while the electron is in motion, there are
actually two holes.  Neither one "moves".

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>