Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] The Pin One Problem
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 08:34:36 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
One word ........ transformers.

Audio transformers can be a convenient way to break-up grounding and RFI problems (owing to generally high CMRR figures) when interfacing equipment. Field engineers often prefer transformer mic inputs in mixers since the device is often taken to temporary or remote locations where it's difficult to quickly control cabling and grounding issues. But, it's still possible to have a "Pin 1" problem with a transformer or active balanced input - if the audio cable shield is connected to the equipment circuit ground rather than bonded at the chassis.

Good transformers are expensive. But there's no reason why today's transceivers and audio accessory equipment cannot be designed using active, balanced inputs using a simple 3-stage instrumentation amp (discrete or on-chip) where CMRR figures approach a transformer across the audio and HF spectrum. It costs the manufacturer little more to design this way.

For short and moderately long cable runs, it is much more important to have a high CMRR balanced input than a balanced output. If the instrumentation amp is doing it's job, it doesn't care if the source is balanced or unbalanced - it's simply bridging a source between two terminals, irrespective of a ground reference. This performance cannot be achieved with a single op-amp. Although a single op-amp input can be labeled as having a differential input they cannot be called "balanced," and CMRR is never as good as can be achieved with the 3-stage circuit.

Getting pretty far OT here, but I'll finish with this thought. As cable runs lengthen, they should be treated like transmission lines and the source Z becomes critically important due to distributed cable capacitance. One broadcast equipment manufacturer has broken the sacred rule for shielding. They use a wire management system composed of hyper-twisted CAT5/6 cabling with tightly controlled source and terminating Z. When CMRR and Z is controlled, there's little need for a cable shield to perform against most common forms of interference. Bell Labs/AT&T knew this probably back in the 1920s. With the use of step-down/step-up repeat coils and twisted pairs, they survived decades without shield cabling, and often circuits were bundled tightly together and yet crosstalk remained acceptably low.

Paul, W9AC





_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>