Hi Bill, you raise some significant points, in the overclocked pc arena a few
people got obsessed with making optically perfect contact patches between the
copper cooling "jackets" and the relevant patches on the cpu, they then used
silver loaded heatsink compound. Thermal resistances were very low, as you can
appreciate many CPUs were dissipating over 100w through a tiny contact patch,
much smaller than most driver transistors in the average 100w HF rig.
I have no experience of any really advanced cooling systems in homebrew gear.
But I personally believe attaching the devices to a good billet of copper is a
reasonable start.
The little pump I used was an immersible mains driven pump intended for water
features, it drove the impeller by induction so I imagine it would be fine in
antifreeze which will keep algae growth down and improve wetting. I am not sure
how close to the ragged edge these PA devices are junction temperature wise.
Often with power supply regulators or audio the answer is to parallel up more
devices to get sensible junction temperatures but RF devices are so expensive
that you don't want to derate them, or at least not by that much. My late
father (G3MNO) used a Morris 1000 radiator and deionised water to shed heat
from an SHF load a long time ago.
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 Jun 2013, at 17:50, "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> wrote:
> Yes, that is the common way to do it, however, it does not address the
> problem with the need for very, very good reliable metal to metal contact
> between the
> device and the block. I have dealt with water cooled solid state device for
> the past 40 years, however, the power flow density of these new high power
> devices
> makes it necessary have very smooth mating surfaces, assure that they don't
> warp and so on. Direct contact water contact with the device and the
> cooling liquid would be much better. It would require sufficient turbulent
> flow against the surface. One problem with air cooled engines is that they
> are limited
> by not only the heat transfer from the air but by the ability of the, in the
> best cases, aluminum to conduct the heat to sufficient fin area. So at best
> you are
> limited to about 50 HP per cylinder as in a 917 compared to 200 HP or more
> per cylinder as in a formula 1 (water cooled) car. A standard cast iron air
> cooled cylinder is limited
> to about 25 HP per cylinder as in a type 1 VW. Now you can get much more for
> a few seconds but continuous power you can't.
> An extra note. The pistons in these engine run at much higher temperatures
> due to the fact that they are cooled mostly by the hot cylinder walls.
>
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
> ________________________________________
> From: David Lisney [g0fvt@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: Fuqua, Bill L
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid state amplifier cooling
>
> With watercooling I would probably use a copper block with water ways drilled
> through, actually it may be a good thing to tap threads through even if you
> solder the pipes in, the threading would increase surface area in contact
> with the water and also increase turbulence... just a thought.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 6 Jun 2013, at 16:09, "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> wrote:
>
>> I noticed just now someone suggested water cooling.
>> The advantage of doing it this way is that the electronic parts remain dry
>> and
>> no problems with the dielectric properties of water or corrosion of the
>> electronic
>> parts. You could use oil but it has less heat capacity than water, from
>> about 1/4 to
>> 1/2. Also, makes a real mess if spilled.
>>
>> 73
>> Bill wa4lav
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of Fuqua, Bill L
>> [wlfuqu00@uky.edu]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:04 AM
>> To: David Lisney; amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid state amplifier cooling
>>
>> You have given me an idea.
>> May not be original but here it is.
>> One problem with the heat transfer from the newer high power devices is
>> making
>> a good reliable contact with the heat sink. You could use liquid cooling.
>> The thought is to mount the device on a flat hollow channel carrying water
>> with a rectangular hole and
>> seal or gasket such that the water comes into direct contact with the
>> devices heat
>> dissipator. With adequate liquid fluid flow the device dissipate its heat
>> directly to the
>> fluid, perhaps water, much better than you would have with a metal to metal
>> to air
>> heat transfer scheme. Warping of the metal is not such a problem either.
>> 73
>> Bill wa4lav
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Amps [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of David Lisney
>> [g0fvt@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 10:35 AM
>> To: amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Solid state amplifier cooling
>>
>> I used to be in the PC overclocking scene many years ago, I used peltier
>> heatpumps and a homebrew water cooling system to keep the CPUs cool, and it
>> did let them operate at extremely high clock speeds... However, the CPUs
>> rated power interpolated to about 40w a piece and the peltier devices were
>> using over 70w a piece. There are published curves of heatpumping capability
>> versus temperature differential etc, mine was quite a high differential
>> trying to run CPUs at close to freezing with a water cooling circuit at
>> probably 30c.
>>
>> I found the biggest challenge was dealing with condensation, ambient air
>> needs to be excluded from areas that are operating below the dew point. The
>> second issue is algae growth!
>>
>> One thing I did learn and will use again is the enormous heat capacity of
>> water, on doing the maths it was surprising just how small a pump is
>> required and just how little flow is required.
>>
>> At the KW level I am sure a vehicle radiator with a very low power fan would
>> suffice, in the case of my computer experiment I only had a few hundred
>> watts to shed and a vehicle heater matrix easily coped (blown by a pair of
>> 120mm 12v fans operated at 7v).
>>
>> I think I would still use a computer fan in the vicinity of the PA section,
>> obviously it is not just the output transistors that generate heat.
>>
>> Watercooling also enables the fans to be remote and keeps the noise away
>> from the operator.
>> Mind you a transistor PA with no tuning is easily remote controlled....
>>
>> Just some thoughts, I have not posted for years but I do read this thread
>> every day.
>>
>> 73 de David G0FVT
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|