Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6M

To: "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>, "'Paul Baldock'" <paul@paulbaldock.com>, "'Amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6M
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 20:53:07 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
There is no such thing as a one size fits all suppressor as tubes have a wide range of parasitic frequencies controlled by tube geometry and circuit layout. A 3-500Z suppressor, for instance, rarely does a good job on a 572B.

The 572B works fine on 6M but takes a deeper understanding of layout, components, and having suitable test equipment.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>
To: "'Paul Baldock'" <paul@paulbaldock.com>; "'Amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200 on 6M


I'd go with 1/4" flat strap in a "U" with a pair of 100 ohm 5w MOX
in parallel.  But, FWIW, I wouldn't use 572Bs either, though I am positive
the latter comment will draw fire.

73 N3DB Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul Baldock
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 7:17 PM
To: Amps
Subject: [Amps] SB200 on 6M

I'm converting a SB200 for 6M. What's the best configuration for the
Anti-Parasitic Choke?

Thanks

- Paul
\

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3184/5878 - Release Date: 06/02/13


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>