Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:00:02 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:05:38 -0400
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "Amps" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] original thread:  Peter Dahl transformers, remark
about capacitors for switching supplies


Start with the 160M lowest reactance disc cap you can scare up at the base 
of the plate choke. A .0047 is adequate for a sane power level and a good RF 
choke.

Then add a healthy glitch resistor and bypass the other end also.The 
resistor has inductance and is self resonant somewhere in the 50-150 MHz 
range for the 20-25W variety. For the 3-500 and similar I also use a 10 Ohm 
20W in series and .001 bypassed as that is good for the parasitic frequency. 
Some amps have an unstable layout and need all the help they can get; in a 
SB-220 RFC-2 is replaced by that resistor.

Any further potential damage to diodes and filter caps comes from 
switching spikes and each complete string should be bypased with an adequate 
.005/.0047 disc and another to ground at the HV output point.

Some add a 1N5408 reverse connected across each cap as a crowbar and a very 
fast fault trip.

Carl
KM1H

##  I used  2-3 x .0047’s  at the base of the plate choke.   Then also 2-3 x 
500 pf ceramic doorknobs, like HEC variety..also at base of plate choke.
The doorknobs make for a better bypass at the higher HF freqs, while the
.0047s  work better at the lower freqs.

##  I use 50 ohm, 50 watt  wire wound for the glitch resistor, then another 
bypass
cap to grnd right at the B+ output.  sometimes I will use a globar for the 
glitch R.  Or paralleled 100 ohm glitch R’s..... or even  4 x  200 ohm
wirewounds or globars in parallel.  Depends on the application. 

##  I have some .0047s  in both 10 kv and also 15 kv.  I’ll try putting 
one across each leg of the FWB, so 4 x caps in total.    That’s actually
a good way to combat switching spikes. 

##  Installing a .01 disc ceramic cap across  each lytic in a HV supply really 
is 
pointless .  With 8 x lytics in series, the  8 x .01 uf disc ceramic caps are 
also in
series.  Your end to end total C is just .01 uf / 8 =   .00125 uf 

##  Putting a reverse connected 1N5408 or 6A10  across each lytic is a good
safety measure.  IF one leg of the FWB ever shorted out,  you would be pumping
raw AC into the lytics on half cycles.   The safety diodes across each lytic in 
that
case would simply conduct, and blow the AC HV fuse.    I install a HV fuse 
between
sec of xfmr and FWB.   The HV fuse can go in either leg of the xfmr sec. Sized 
correctly,
that works a lot faster than a 240 vac breaker.  

##  I noticed on the Dahl  FWB boards, he uses a MOV across each of the 6A10 
diodes.
I like carl’s  method of a .0047 uf across the entire leg. 

later... Jim  VE7RF




_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark, Jim Thomson <=