To: | Amps <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark about capacitors for switching supplies |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:27:41 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:44:48 -0400, Steve wrote: >Can you bypass the cold end of a RF choke too much? >Say, I put 6 or 8 - .0047 pf caps in parallel to carry the RF current. And, >the plate coke is 180 mh and it's on 160. >What would be the result, other than wasting caps? Just an issue of >'deminishing returns', or substantial effect on tank tuning? > >73 de Steve, NR4M REPLY: Multiple caps are a good idea, but I would make them different values and physical sizes to spread out the resonances instead of having them all resonant on the same frequency. To answer your question - you probably can bypass too much, but what you have suggested is ok. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark about capacitors for switching supplies, Steve Bookout |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] 425 amp, k8leewmm |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark about capacitors for switching supplies, Steve Bookout |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] original thread: Peter Dahl transformers, remark about capacitors for switching supplies, Carl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |