To: | "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "Amps" <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] AL80b low power |
From: | "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:45:26 -0400 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Subject: Re: [Amps] AL80b low power ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:10:26 -0500, W3TZ wrote: <snip>, these schematics (Ameritton) will not meet MIL SPEC.REPLY: Are you surprised? I once did an engineering change for an aircraft manufacturer that was no more than leaving the paint off one chassis part and going with bare chromate finish. Their drawings are done to MIl Spec equivalent.The cost, which was purely a drawing change, was a cool $5000. They paid itwith no complaints. And that's why Ameritron drawings are not Mil Spec. Would you prefer they were? Show me the money. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT Id be happy if they at least followed convention instead of inventing their own. Must of been that guy playing engineer as they look a lot like some Dentrons. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Source for good 572B's tubes?, Carl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Source for good 572B's tubes?, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] AL80b low power, Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] AL80b low power, Robert Dorchuck W6VY |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |