To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Question about separate power supply/RF section amp |
From: | Vic K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0800 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
They are cheap. On 1/17/2013 2:05 PM, Bill Turner wrote: ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:07 -0800, K2VCO wrote: <snip>Is this a safe arrangement? I am thinking of adding another diode from B- to chassis in the RF section. I don't see how this could hurt, but it might help clamp the voltage in the event of an arc.REPLY: It is pretty safe, but I would suggest using a total of four diodes, two back-to-back in the PS and two back-to-back in the RF deck. Normally you only need one diode for protection from arcs to ground, but someone posted here years ago how a weird combination of an arc plus a broken ground could require a second diode, reverse connected to the first one. Cheap insurance. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps -- Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Eimac AS-47 2m 8877 amp?, Steve Thompson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Eimac AS-47 2m 8877 amp?, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Question about separate power supply/RF section amp, Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Question about separate power supply/RF section amp, TexasRF |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |