We have roughed-out a plenum & PS design for a 1x8877 & a 2x8877, in
addition to the 2x & 3x3CX800A7 - utilizing the same chassis.
The 3CPX800 is taking priority now over the 8877.
Dan Simmonds
Tom Osborne wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Also I'm curious about the rationale for using two little puppies in
> parallel instead of a single 3CX1500A7/8877 tube...it sounds like you have
> given this key decision a lot of thought?
>
> Leigh
> VK5KLT
>
>
> I thought an 8877 could go south very easily. Real low grid dissapation or
> something like that. 73
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|