Hi Gerald,
I could use K1FO's design, but I already have a "nice" working unit.  The K1FO 
won't physically fit in my RF chamber ( well it might with a hammer), and I 
just wanted to do something quick to get perhaps a few extra watts and a bit 
more headroom for JT65B, and know that I have a replacement tube.
I've got a 2x3cpx800 started, but if I could get a new stripline shoehorned 
into the existing amp, that would be great.  It does sound like I have lots of 
options.  
Maybe I should just build a new strip and fire it up to see what happens?  
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: TexasRF@aol.com
To: kg7hf@comcast.net, amps@contesting.com
Sent: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:41:11 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [Amps] Stripline design
Hi Paul, the single tube design has less capacitance at the tube than the 
dual tube design. The lower the capacitance at the tube anode, the more 
inductance required to resonate. More inductance equates to a longer 
stripline.
 
If you need more inductance, a narrower stripline will have a higher 
impedance and that will cause more inductance for a given length.
 
Added C at the tuning flapper will also lower the resonant frequency just 
as increased inductance does. But, that comes with a price of higher loaded Q 
that translates to higher losses. More tuning C will involve closer spacing 
between the stripline and tuning flapper. Closer spacing means more likely to 
flashover. You can increase the width of the flapper to increase the C and 
retain the wider spacing.
 
Lot's of design trade offs here!
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
In a message dated 1/5/2012 9:51:16 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
kg7hf@comcast.net writes:
Hi 
  group,
NHY to all!   I am working on an amplifier mod and 
  need some advice.  I have a currently working 70cm stripline amp based on 
  the 3cx400A7 tube.  As everyone knows, that tube is getting rare and 
  expensive.  Since I have a few 3cpx800A7's around here, I thought it 
  might be a good fit to change to that tube, especially for the eme contest at 
  the end of the month.
Besides the obvious physical size and heater 
  voltage, there is a slight difference in cin and cpk, I'm not sure what that 
  will do.  I've never found any design plans, but this stripline is 3.5" x 
  8.625" long. and the tube is 0.25" (tube center is 1.05" from end) from one 
  end.   
To fit the 3cpx800, I would have to extend the 
  stripline 0.375" so the tube would still be connected making it 9.0" 
  long.  You can see what I mean 
  here:
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/388232_2684319340428_1029693354_32301613_317232212_n.jpg
Does 
  extending the "null" end of the stripline make any difference?  What 
  effect would this have?
I dug up the K1FO single 3cx800A7 70cm stipline 
  documentation and it shows the stripline as being 3.5 x 9.6875", 
unfortunately 
  I don't think that will fit in my deck without extra work.  On the other 
  hand though, I looked at K1FO's 2x3cx800 stripline and it is 9.0" long, just 
  like mine would be.  Any speculation on why K1FO single has a much longer 
  stripline than I do and why his two hole has the shorter one?  My guess 
  is the tune flappers might be in different locations and that makes the 
  difference.
Thanks for the insight on this and 73,
Paul, 
  kg7hf
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing 
  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 
 |