To: | "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century |
From: | "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:29:11 -0400 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century > The W8JI article quoted by G8TIC explains what they thought they were > doing and why Tom > thinks it's a bad idea: > <http://www.w8ji.com/vhf_stability.htm> That is one mans opinion. I havent read it recently but it started off primarily as a rant against Rich Measures and seems to get occassionally edited as others correct him. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century, Carl |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Any new tube research? (WAS) Re: New NXP BLF578XR 1200W LDMOS FET is "indestructible", jeff millar |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century, Vic K2VCO |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century, Carl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |