Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century

To: "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:29:11 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] TL-922 --> 21st century


> The W8JI article quoted by G8TIC explains what they thought they were 
> doing and why Tom
> thinks it's a bad idea:
> <http://www.w8ji.com/vhf_stability.htm>


That is one mans opinion. I havent read it recently but it started off 
primarily as a rant against Rich Measures and seems to get occassionally 
edited as others correct him.

Carl
KM1H

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>