Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?

To: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?
From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:15:57 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Because I did not know they were going for that much.  Where do you
see the high prices?  under tables at flea markets?

Rob
K5UJ

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Fuqua, Bill L <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> wrote:
> With HC10 going for more than receivers such as HQ180s and HQ170s why would 
> you buy one?
> These have the same IF ans in the HC10.
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
> ________________________________________
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Rob Atkinson [ranchorobbo@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 1:40 PM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: [Boatanchors] Best Boatanchor 160-10mReceiversforSSB?
>
> If you wind up with an old AM/CW rx with a 455 KHz IF you can keep a
> look out for a hammarlund HC-10 and it will give you SSB coverage and
> maintain the tube signal chain.
>
> I don't know what the prices are but RME might be a manufacturer to
> look for.  I have seen NC300s go for pretty cheap so that is certainly
> a very good rx for the money and ya gotta love that weighted flywheel
> tuning.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>