Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry

To: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:56:28 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
All this 77 talk reminded me that I have a NOS Dahl internal SX transformer 
wasting shelf space.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry


> To Jim's point, I forgot that I had also changed the plate choke in my 
> 77Dx
> to a B&W 802.  Actually, Dick Byrd, N4UQ rewound the old #800.  At one 
> time,
> he offered a trade-in service where he would keep #802 chokes on the shelf
> and as #800 chokes came in he would strip them to the ceramic core and
> rewind to the #802 standard.
>
> Of all the changes I've made to my 77Dx, getting the filament voltage back
> within spec has been most important.  So far, no 8877 replacements. 
> Before,
> I was replacing them way too often when more than 5.5V was on the 
> filament.
> Utility voltage runs between 250V-255V here, averaging 252V.  I suppose I
> can ask the utility company to try and re-tap that down by 10V but I'm not
> sure of the feasibility with ground-mounted residential utility
> transformers.   Anyone have experience with these?
>
> Open filaments and filament-to-cathode shorts were common and expensive
> occurrences. At least now with the filament choke, if the cathode shorts 
> to
> the filament, I won't loose drive and the amp will probably keep limping
> along until that structure finally fails.  If I had to go back in and take
> it a step further, I think I would add a separate filament transformer and
> add a variable control on the rear panel along with a pair of insulated 
> test
> jacks (through 1K resistors and chokes) for filament voltage monitoring 
> with
> a high-Z DMM.
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:40 AM
> Subject: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:35:01 -0400
>> From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry
>>
>> George,
>>
>> If 160m is of interest to you, may want to re-evaluate Henry amps,
>> including
>> the 5K.
>>
>> Concerning mods for the 77Dx/Sx:  few mods have been published and either
>> version of the 77 is fine as it is.  I own a 77Dx and have avoided a
>> conversion to the Sx for several reasons:
>>
>> 1) Added cost of an 8877 during replacement;
>>
>> &&  You also require 2 x tubes, 2 x sockets, 2 x parasitic suppressor`s
>> etc.
>> The 8877  is a 50 ohm tube...and a pair = 25 ohms.   The cheap and dirt
>> fix  would
>> be a 50-25 ohm un-un.... between ouput of stock tuned input..and 
>> cathodeS.
>>
>> &&& Your plate load Z  will now be one half the original Z.  That implies
>> DOUBLE
>> the C1  + C2 used on each band.   That also implies on half the stock uh
>> be used on each band.
>> IE:  your stock tank taps are out to lunch with  2 x tubes.  And ditto
>> with the L potion of the PI-L.
>>
>> && The stock  plate choke is just a 90 uh, B+W 800 type.  You need a
>> bigger choke...like a  802
>> or an Ameritron.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2) Slightly added difficulty in isolating trouble with a pair of tubes. 
>> A
>> minor issue;
>> 3) The added class of power really requires changing the RF output
>> connector
>> to a DIN type;
>>
>> &&& That stock 46 lb xfmr  won`t handle  2 x 8877`s.   It will barely
>> handle one tube as is.
>> The stock xfmr is only aprx a 2.8 kva CCS unit.
>>
>> &&&  I think the stock xfmr, when used with 2 x tubes... is good for aprx
>> 3300 w out pep.  You
>> don`t need a 7-16 din for that power level.  Silver+ Teflon  SO-239  +
>> mating silver-teflon males
>> are just fine below 6 kw.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 5) Relatively poor Ep regulation of the Sx version unless an outboard
>> Hypersil transformer is used.  Some folks have reported better regulation
>> with a direct- replacement Dahl type although it's a snug fit;
>>
>> &&& If an outboard dahl is used, and more drive applied, you will destroy
>> those torroids used
>> in both the  PI  and  the L section...poof.   I think it was frontier
>> electonics in Colorado that custom
>> made bigger torroids for the 2 x 8877 alpha 77-sx..esp when an outboard
>> xfmr is used.
>>
>> 6) The Dx already has way more reserve than needed for most operating
>> modes
>> in American-licensed service.
>>
>> &&& I`d leave it alone....in the 1 x tube mode.  You won`t get another 
>> 3db
>> out of it, unless an outboard
>> xfmr is used anyway.  Then you still have to re-do all the taps, tuned
>> input, metering, new b+ supply, plate choke,
>> 160m padding caps,etc.
>>
>> && If you require more db`s... a single YC-156 and a surplus  10 kva
>> hypersil  pole pig will clean house...
>> and be a lot simpler.  Stuff  200 w into a YC-156...and you will need  4 
>> x
>> 8877`s  to get even get close.
>> Those  10 kva CCS  surplus pole pigs are aprx slightly less than 1 cubic
>> foot, and weigh 120 lbs.
>>
>> later... Jim   VE7RF
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>