Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry

To: "George Steube" <at6c@bellsouth.net>, <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:35:01 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
George,

If 160m is of interest to you, may want to re-evaluate Henry amps, including 
the 5K.

Concerning mods for the 77Dx/Sx:  few mods have been published and either 
version of the 77 is fine as it is.  I own a 77Dx and have avoided a 
conversion to the Sx for several reasons:

1) Added cost of an 8877 during replacement;
2) Slightly added difficulty in isolating trouble with a pair of tubes.  A 
minor issue;
3) The added class of power really requires changing the RF output connector 
to a DIN type;
4) Fuse holders should be upgraded;
5) Relatively poor Ep regulation of the Sx version unless an outboard 
Hypersil transformer is used.  Some folks have reported better regulation 
with a direct- replacement Dahl type although it's a snug fit;
6) The Dx already has way more reserve than needed for most operating modes 
in American-licensed service.

Added together, I just can't justify the change.  However, I did make the 
following changes to my 77Dx:

1) Isolated neutral from chassis ground.  As it stands, these Alpha amps are 
not UL compliant.  Although not compliant with the NEC, the NEC is factually 
a premise wiring standard -- not a product wiring standard.  The mod is 
super-easy since it involves only cutting a jumper on the Cinch-Jones power 
plug.  However, 4-wire service and 4-wire power cord is required.  If you 
have not already added 4-wire 240V service, consider it if you plan on using 
older Alpha and Henry amps;

2) Elevated the filament return off the chassis.  I detest the chassis being 
used for high-current filament returns -- even more of a concern with the Sx 
as 20A of current flows in the chassis.  It's a personal bias of mine; many 
Alpha amps have run for decades without issues;

3) Added a filament choke.  A side benefit is that there's just enough of an 
IR drop through the choke as a result of my 250VAC mains to ensure that the 
filaments run at 5.0V.  Before adding the choke, my filament voltage ran 
above Eimac's specification and I was replacing tubes way too often because 
of filament issues.  High filament voltage combined with many intermittent 
on/off cycles leads to these failures.  Also, after inclusion of the choke, 
I did not tie the filament to the cathode (e.g., AL-1500) although that 
could be done if I were convinced of the necessity.  I've seen arguments 
both ways (primarily fault related) from respected amp designers as well as 
former Eimac engineers.  It stays unconnected for now;

4) Added gas discharge tubes to the filament and cathode terminals, and 
added bypass caps to the filaments connections.

Just my $0.02, and I'm sure others will disagree with me on some of these 
changes.  Good thing I'm not writing article for QST!

Paul, W9AC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Steube" <at6c@bellsouth.net>
To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 7:58 AM
Subject: [Amps] Alpha vs Henry


> Looking at purchasing an Alpha SX/DX or Henry 5K for my amp collection. 
> Any
> advice/comments on these amps would be appreciated.  My biggest concern 
> with
> the Henry would be future tube replacement.   Any recommend mods for 
> either
> amp?  Thanks.
> George
> W2GS
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>