Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] choke the question

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] choke the question
From: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:37:34 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Is it possible to choke this line of discussion?

Charles Harpole k4vud@hotmail.com 


 
> From: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:29:25 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question
> 
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> 
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:17:06 -0700, Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
> wrote:
> 
> >I was thinking (perhaps in error) that if the parasitic network was 
> >right at the cathode connection it might be more effective in the case 
> >where there was imperfect shielding between the goesinna and goesoutta. 
> >(quite often the practical case)
> 
> REPLY:
> 
> You can't just move the same parasitic suppressor from the anode to
> the cathode. It is designed for a relatively high impedance circuit
> whereas your cathode is relatively low. There are a number of ways to
> accomplish suppression in the cathode area. Check the archives for the
> last week or so on the subject. 
> 
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>