To: | "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes |
From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:19:29 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:09:11 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote: > >Wrong again. Many tubes are not stable in any easily or economically >duplicatable layout. It helps to have actual experience before making >blanket and foolish statements. REPLY: Advice from the master of cut and try and what the hell was that? :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 2 x 4-1000 supressor., Bill, W6WRT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] 2 x 4-1000 supressor., Roger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes, Carl |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes, DF3KV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |