I don't want this to sound snarky, but it is going to take a LONG time
to make up for those wasted watts, (even at about 18 cents a kwh up
here, no idea what it would be for the original poster) from the cost
difference of those tubes.
Don't get me wrong, I would also choose a 8877 if they were even close
in price, but even a pull is still 5x the price of a NOS gs35b.
--Ryan w8cya
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Bill, W6WRT <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:15:47 -0700, Patrick Barthelow
> <apolloeme@live.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Then even the possibility of choosing a GS 35B tube as as the basis of the
>>amp.
>
> REPLY:
>
> I would recommend against using a GS-35b. Their efficiency is low
> compared to other types. I and several others have obtained
> efficiencies in the range of about 50%, compared to about 60% for an
> 8877 and other comparable tubes.
>
> Aside from poor efficiency they do seem to work well so that is not
> necessarily a show-stopper, just something to consider.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|