Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] HV lytic max V ratings..some notes

To: <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] HV lytic max V ratings..some notes
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:29:16 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Thanks for the update, I'll read it on my next AM visit to the loo (-;

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] HV lytic max V ratings..some notes


> Further to my email about MIL HDBK 217F:
> It is dated 1990, so, not as current as you might like, but a good 
> reference.
> page 10-24 refers to some aluminium electrolytics with a table for 125C 
> types.
>
> What 217 provides is a standardised way to evaluate failure rates for all 
> sorts of components under all sorts of conditions, so, you can vary just 
> the voltage ratio or temperature and see how this influences reliability.
>
> Type MIL HDBK 217F into Google and download the pdf for yourself.
>
> David
> G3UNA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>