Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LCR meter

To: "Larry Benko" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] LCR meter
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:51:47 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
It would be interesting to see what a 1kHz instrument would read with that 
same core.

A 2 mix is a poor performer at 50kHz and you might be reading true 
inductance.

Also at 30 mHz it only takes a few turns in the typical input network. At 6M 
the 6 mix is the core of choice.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Benko" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] LCR meter


> Here are some real numbers I just measured on a network analyzer
> calibrated at the plane of the core being measured.
>
> Core = T94-2 powdered iron u=10, 22 turns #18 occupying about 80% of core
>
> Msmt. freq.     L(measured)
>
> 50KHz           3.06uH
> 100KHz          3.86uH
> 200KHz          4.53uH
> 500KHz          4.51uH
> 1MHz            4.50uH
> 5MHz            4.50uH
> 10MHz           4.58uH
> 20MHz           4.89uH
> 30MHz           5.52uH
> 40MHz           6.80uH
> 68.1MHz         parallel resonant freq.
>
> As can be seen frequencies above 10MHz show the beginning effects of the
> parallel resonance and low measurement frequencies underestimate the
> inductance by a significant amount.  Also mounting the inductor in a
> metal box will reduce the inductance. I suspect if the measurement freq.
> was 1KHz the values would be even lower.  I always measure near the
> frequency I intend to use the inductor at and if possible with the
> inductor mounted in the enclosure.  Then calibrating to the inductor
> plane gives the "real" inductance and filters and matching networks come
> out as predicted.
>
> 73,
> Larry, W0QE
>
>
>
>
> Vic K2VCO wrote:
>> On 3/30/2010 4:47 AM, Jack/W6NF wrote:
>>
>>> I have used an HP LCR meter at work but never paid any attention to the
>>> frequency at which the measurement is made. I wonder what discrepancies 
>>> in
>>> measurement values of L and C could be encountered if one measured at
>>> various RF frequencies, and why they might occur. I have seen such
>>> discrepancies, using a popular antenna analyzer, even though I was 
>>> careful
>>> not to introduce sources of error, like lead lengths.
>>>
>>
>> If the coil has a ferrite or iron core of any kind, the inductance varies 
>> a lot with
>> frequency. Inductors with cores must be measured near the operating 
>> frequency. And in
>> general, as you raise the frequency the various stray capacitances and 
>> inductances in the
>> device under test become more significant.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>