Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:41:03 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:02:43 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:

>
>The discussion is about the 3-500 and the SB-220 in particular. Why add 
>other tubes that are inherently stable or do you just want to water down the 
>discussion?

REPLY:

It was you who quoted the Eimac engineer about the damage Rich's mods caused to
masses of 8877's. 

I'm still waiting for an explanation - or even a guess - as to how any of Rich's
mods could damage a tube. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>