Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] little OT, but here goes . . .

To: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] little OT, but here goes . . .
From: "David Cutter" <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:36:07 +0100
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Loud is good, louder is better
David
G3UNA

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: [Amps] little OT, but here goes . . .


> How 'bout a 'pithy' comment roundup?
>
> I'll start with two or three hoary chestnuts:
>
> Life is too short for wire antennas, short towers, and QRP.
>
> Awesome arrays and tall towers can give you front-to-back ratio, but only
> active                         devices get you forward gain.
>
> In days of old, when hams were bold, and sideband uninvented, the word 
> would
> pass                 by pounded brass, and all were well-contented.
>
> Your turn ;o)
>
> 73 Dave W8FGX
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>