Scott Manthe wrote:
> Only the biggest lid in the universe would jeopardized our allocation on
> 60 meters by using an amp there.
>
> I certainly hope you mistyped, or the hobby is in worse shape than I
> imagined.
>
> Scott, N9AA
>
yeah, you all are right, i did not mistype but failed to type. My
problem is that i think faster than i type. I am an Army MARS type and
of course, we have access to about 80+ freqs outside the Ham bands with
power up to 500W if necessary.
anyway, our alternate freq as stated, is at 90m.. almost exactly and we
have to use that for our 1900local nets because critical freq just seems
to drop into the 3s and too often into the mid 2s. in fact, we just
might have to start cutting longer dipoles if the information on the
slowing of the solar equatorial conveyor belt proves out. that means
that what we are having now in our Cycle 23? minimums is going to get
worse in Cycle 24 and we don't want to talk about Cy 25.
http://tinyurl.com/yurxqv
I am really surprised that this NASA announcement is not getting more
play on the ham elists. hmmm????
regards
chas/k5dam
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|