To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] 4CX250 IMD |
From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
Date: | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:30:25 +0200 (CEST) |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Carl, >Or is there no agreement on a standard?< I think there's tendency to use 'relative to PEP' over here, although often without stating the fact, and relative to one tone of a two tone signal in some quarters in the US, such as Eimac. And it doesn't matter as long as you state which you're using. Same as receiver sensitivity measured in microvolts - EMF or PD. 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] New SB-200 owner, Peter Chadwick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] 4CX250 IMD, Steve Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] No lids, no mud wrestlers..., Rod Elliott |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] 4CX250 IMD, Peter Chadwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |