To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Gassy Tubes/Technology Museum looking for artifacts |
From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:47:40 +0200 (CEST) |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
>The comment about staying in the socket in airborne equipment makes good sense. I had always wondered why the 832A/829B/3E29 used such a convoluted glass and complicated socket.< The ability to stay in the socket under vibration conditions is surely more down to the socket design. And retainers weren't unknown in WW2! 807s were used in some British military equipemnt: some were made over here with white ceramic bases, too, but I don't believe the diffrence in RF performance was noticeable. 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Radio Handbook Classic Pr 813 RF Deck F/S, Pat Barthelow |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] AL-1500 question, Junior |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Gassy Tubes/Technology Museum looking for artifacts, Karl-Arne Markström |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] 1625s, john . brewer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |