Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] suppressors

To: <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] suppressors
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:49:14 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
However there are instances, for whatever reason, that a resistive material 
solves the problem. National Radio discovered this in the early 60's when 
building a Jeep mounted 4CX1500A HF xcvr for the USAF. Size and contract 
restraints resulted in an anode "cavity" that couldnt be tamed by 
conventional methods. The engineers went with out of the box thinking on 
that one.

CArl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Chadwick" <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] suppressors


> Steve said:
>>In every case so far, copper gives
> better 'goodness'.<
> Which, from purely a theoretical viewpoint, is exactly what should be 
> expected.
> 73
> Peter G3RZP
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>