Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Bird wattmeter
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:24:39 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Let's not lose sight f the fact that an Accredited Test Laboratory is expected 
to have a measurement uncertainty to a 95% certainty level for conducted power 
of less than +/-0.75dB. That takes into account cable losses, mismatch losses 
in loads, connectors, etc., but give you some idea of the problems even in  
professional lab set up.
Q measurement depends on whether you are measuring real Q or apparent Q: the 
latter is fairly easy to measure by very loose coupling and a bandwidth 
measurement. But then you have to ask yourself 'For what reason do I need a 
very accurate measurement of Q?' It can be a bit too easy to get yourself hung  
up on measurement uncertainty if you don't figure why you need the answer to 
that accuracy. Real Q on an echo box is relatively easy to measure, but not 
something very applicable to most of us...
Working Q, as in a tank circuit or antenna tuner, is another matter as far as 
measurement goes. Not an easy measurement, but why would you want to bother 
knowing, other than to a first approximation, which you can get by doing a few 
sums?

73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>