| To: | Peter Voelpel <df3kv@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network |
| From: | Claude Frantz <r31dmaeu@pc0312a.rz.unibw-muenchen.de> |
| Reply-to: | r31dmaeu@pc0312b.rz.unibw-muenchen.de |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:13:05 +0200 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Peter Voelpel wrote: > Would be very interesting. > And the Pi-L IS better then the Pi on harmonic suppression. Yes, it is better. But a little bit only. If you have a serious harmonic supression problem, it will probably not be sufficient. This is the reason why I think that it is not the preferable way to seek for a solution in the Pi-L. If it works for you, then it's fine. > I use it in all my monoband amps. Fine ! Best 73 de Claude _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] Sb-200 question, Gudguyham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, Steve Thompson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, David J Windisch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, Steve Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |