Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information

To: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information
From: Dick Knol <dick.knol@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:50:10 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Pete,

Thanks for the contribution, we will see when this subject will be killed by 
the Administrator. It's getting morning time in Georgia.
My statement is not a matter of taking sides. However, I oppose dictatorship 
and censorship. As a free man in a free world I strongly support free 
speech. If that is taking sides so be it.

Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information


>I don't want to take sides here, as Dick seems to, but I have been on this
> amps reflector since it began.  There are some extraordinarily strong egos
> in the amps community, and some intense bad blood between the participants
> in a feud that now goes back about 10 years.  For many years this feud
> would ebb and flow, and most of us non-feuders either got good with the
> delete key or filtered out the e-mail addresses of the participants.  I 
> did
> the latter, because my theory was that if there was anything being said
> that was of value, then a third party would probably be involved, and I'd
> see the gist of it from things that person posted with quotes from the
> others.  At various times, all of the players had useful things to say, so
> this worked well.
>
> Then the administration of the list changed.  I don't know the details, 
> but
> the new admin decided to take a firmer hand.  Things blew up, he banned
> some people, and a lot of the group's participants moved to the Yahoo
> group.  I probably should sample its throughput to see how the
> signal-to-noise ratio is.  But in any case, what you are seeing is typical
> of what happens when a group fragments - both remaining parts suffer.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
>     At 02:58 AM 3/20/2007, Dick wrote:
>>Sure it did. Once knowledgable people are kicked off and only the
>>Administrators opinion can be aired the quality of the contributions goes
>>down the drain.
>>For more interesting contributions concerning the subject: (high) power
>>amplifiers see the http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ham_amplifiers/ 
>>reflector.
>>
>>Cheers, Dick
>>PA3DUV
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
>>To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:10 AM
>>Subject: [Amps] AMP Reflector Quality of Information
>>
>>
>> > Is it just me or has the quality of the content on this reflector gone
>> > downhill, bigtime?
>> >
>> > Bob W6TR
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Amps mailing list
>> > Amps@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Amps mailing list
>>Amps@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>