| To: | sm0aom@telia.com, g8gsq@eltac.co.uk, amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] 3CPX vs 3CX tubes |
| From: | Gudguyham@aol.com |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:52:54 EDT |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 10/21/2006 2:59:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, sm0aom@telia.com writes: This was in the "pre Russian tube" era, otherwise one or more GS35's or GU84's probably would have been used. 73/ Karl-Arne SM0AOM I have used the GS-35B a couple of times, the tube is rugged and cheap and will do FLL with 100 watts drive. However, I have found it to be no match for the 8877 at the same drive levels. Lou _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] 3CPX vs 3CX tubes, Karl-Arne Markström |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Fw: 3CPX vs 3CX tubes, Gudguyham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 3CPX vs 3CX tubes, Karl-Arne Markström |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] 3CPX vs 3CX tubes, Peter Voelpel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |