To: | Karl-Arne MarkstrÃm <sm0aom@telia.com>,Martin Sole <msole@loxinfo.co.th>, amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Technical specification question, possibly OT ! |
From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
Date: | Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:23:24 +0200 (CEST) |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Karl Arne said: >but there have recently been discussions about an ETSI spectral purity >specification for transmitters in general.< Do you know where in ETSI or CEPT? I go to the ETSI committees which I would expect to handle this, (ERM_RM, ERM, and occasionally ERM_EMC)although admittedly, I don't go to CEPT PT SE21. I do have access to their documentation however, and I haven't heard of this. For a governement run Test house, it's just a money spinner 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Parasitic Suppressors for GI-7B., robert briggs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] 572B bias FL2100, Peter Chadwick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Technical specification question, possibly OT !, Peter Chadwick |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Technical specification question, possibly OT !, Peter Chadwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |