Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] PARASITICS AND fILAMENT SAG

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] PARASITICS AND fILAMENT SAG
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:35:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On the contrary, I find this thread quite entertaining.  Not only does it
shed light on an interesting problem, it provides a verbal version of "Clash
of the Titans." :^)

73, Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Edwin Karl
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:14 AM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] PARASITICS AND fILAMENT SAG


Gentlemen-

It would seem that someone should call the ASPCA on this
discission/argument.
That's for beating a dead horse.

I joined this thread several months ago to seek information regarding
amplifiers.
This argument as restated the discussion so much my head hurts. It takes
meaningless bits and bytes to convey and again nothing is new.

Whether or not one supressor works the same way or not dosen't matter. They
both seem to work. End of discussion.

If you want to reargue, visit the history mentioned in an earlier trhread
and just read what's there, written 11 years ago.

Just please STOP THE MADNESS.

ed K0KL
[snip]

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>