I'm getting tired of this endless attacking and name calling. Obviously
Rich's suppressors work. Some just can't seem to admit that part and
want to argue the technical differences in what they COULD do if they
chose to MODIFY or FIX the conventional one versus what he has done and
does do with his. Trying to prove your argument by saying what you can
do to a conventional suppressor to match what Rich's does gives you no
license to call him or anyone else names. Like a child, calling names is
a simple effort to make one look big in the eyes of his peers. In fact,
it works just the opposite.
I have to wonder why people like to circle like a bunch of wild dogs
waiting for the first sign of a drop of blood so they can all attack.
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
<snip>
>
> You are presenting data out of context and misrepresenting Wes's
> work. That is intellectually dishonest and no different than
> the journalist or prosecutor who asks, "well Mr. Measures, please
> tell us when you stopped beating your wife."
>
<snip>
>
> You should know all about doublespeak - you're the expert.
>
<snip>
>>>
>>> That not one manufacturer of amateur amplifiers uses nichrome
>>> suppressors -
<snip>
>
> As usual, when you lack an intelligent argument you make incoherent
> noises.
>
<snip>
>
> You are a charlatan and a fool ...
<snip>
Like any competent con man, your
> "story" has just enough to be initially plausible. However, like
> the Nigerian e-mail scam, simple fact checking reveals the hoax.
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
73, Tony W4ZT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|