> Now you've got me worried. I am building an amp using a
> 4CX1500A and didn't
> have a filament transformer that would supply 5V at 42A
> but I do have 2
> identical 25A transformers. Am I going to run into
> trouble here? I plan to
> use a step start circuit to control start up inrush.
I think the problem of directly paralleling identical
transformers is highly exaggerated. My guess is the paranoia
comes from people who assume few percent turns difference
will somehow behave like a shorted turn. That isn't the case
at all.
The only potential for problems comes from a sloppy winding
method that has a quite large percentage of turns error
between two transformers so the voltage difference is large
compared to the combined ESR of the transformers. I suppose
some transformers might have such grave errors, but they
would be easy to test for. This also would ONLY apply if the
transformers had parallel connections on both the primary
and secondary sides. Place either or both sides in series
and the perceived problem vanishes, although a secondary
insulation breakdown problem might exist with series
connected HV secondarys.
Let's look at an example. Say we had one half volt per turn
transformer with a 10 volt secondary that had 10.5 volts
open circuit and 10 volts at a full load current of 10 amps.
Let's assume they don't monitor the 240 turn 120 volt
primary so well in winding and it is 250 turns on one
transformer and 240 turns on the other. Now we have a
secondary NL voltage 96 percent of the ideal voltage on one
compared to the other, or 10.08 volts compared to 10.5 volts
on the other no load. That's very poor transformer QC.
Since we know the full load voltage of a single transformer
drops 1/2 volt with a 10 amp load, we know the ESR is .5/10
= .05 ohms in each transformer. We have .1 ohms total ESR
with the secondary difference driving the largely
dissipative resistance (some may be due to flux leakage and
not cause heat). 1/2 volt across the .1 ohm ESR is .5
squared over .1 ohms ESR or about 2.5 watts of extra heat
split between two transformers. That's due to the .5 over .1
= 5 amps of no-load circulating currents flowing through the
.1 ohm ESR.
The operating dissipation of a perfect transformer would be
somewhat more than secondary I squared times secondary ESR,
or 10^2 * .05 = 5 watts. The higher voltage transformer
would get a few percent more heat than the other since it
has a little more voltage at the same current, but not much.
We've added about 2.5 watts maximum heat to each
transformer that would normally be dissipating about 5 watts
at full load.
To simplify this explanation I've left out a couple things
that would have a small effect (like the small heatless flux
leakage for one), but you get the general picture.
You can see in this case the error between transformers,
even in the case of very stiff transformers, has to be
pretty large to add significant heat. In this case a ~5%
open circuit voltage error produced an additional 50% heat.
I can tell you something from my experience at a company
where we wound transformers and coils used in the
aftermarket automotive industry. Where no one cared about
precise turns our oldest poorest coil winding machines would
be within one turn plus 3% of total turns. In more critical
devices we would use machines that were always exact. We
could wind a 1000 turn coil and have 1000 turns every time.
The only error would be if the operator unwound a turn when
making a connection.
I suppose we could have two identical transformers off a few
percent, but it would be easy to check for. Just measure the
primary no-load magnetizing current of the two transformers
with and without the secondary paralleled. You can calculate
the maximum dissipation increase of the pair by knowing that
current increase and the primary voltage.
My bet is this is one of those things that got started
because someone somewhere thought a two turn difference
would act like a shorted turn in one transformer, which it
would not ever do. So now we are all paranoid about nothing.
When I want to read much ado about nothing, I read the amps
reflector. :-)
73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|