To: | <Amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] A plea for fewer acronyms |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:30:52 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: A recent poster wrote: >amp would never pass FCC TA >requirements ------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------ It took me a while to figure out what "TA" means in the above - Type Acceptance. Please guys, fewer acronyms! Unless you're sure your readers will know the acronym without hesitation, type it out. Only takes a second or two and will avoid much consternation. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Bandswicth failure, R L Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Henry 4K-Ultra Schematic Error, m.ford |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] HLA-150 information page, Tom W8JI |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] Pad and Air Variable Load Caps, Angelo Karabetsos |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |