| To: | dcoffman@iquest.net, g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** RE: Parasitic Resistors |
| From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
| Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:19:32 +0200 (CEST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> I am curious if 'slightly inductive' is too inductive for this application.< It depends. Parasitic suppression is very dependent on a number of things, especially layout and lead lengths and tubes and components... I like a process of empiric eclecticism. i.e 'suck it and see' 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] Really silly question, Peter Chadwick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such, k7fm |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Really silly question, Peter Chadwick |
| Next by Thread: | [Amps] Q and Resonance, Bill Fuqua |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |