"My objection was to your all-inclusive comment. Had you said "some
amateurs..." I would have been silent.
Bill, W6WRT"
My original post was intended to comment on how the FCC viewed us, rather on
the competence of any individual.
Colin K7FM
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
>Sent: Jan 9, 2006 10:01 AM
>To: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>, Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>,
>amps@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37
>
>
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>At 09:41 AM 1/9/2006, Colin Lamb wrote:
>>Bill said: "I do take exception to the part about "not technically
>>able...". Hams
>>can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire,
>>not ability."
>>
>>Response: No question that many are technically competent - but the
>>FCC does not hold us to commercial standards. They consider us
>>amateurs, for better or worse. Rules are written for the least
>>competent, rather than the most competent.
>>
>>Colin K7FM
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>My objection was to your all-inclusive comment. Had you said "some
>amateurs..." I would have been silent.
>
>Bill, W6WRT
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|